Sunday, December 23, 2007
Globalism is the enemy; Mexicans and Indigenous peoples are just being used.
First of all, the Tejanos and Californios were a society that was intermarrying Mexicans and Americans and actually had a very solid egelatarianism among the settlers. Also, both indigenous tribes and mexican Americans have served honorably in the US military by the hundreds of thousands.
Mexican Americans have more Medals of Honor for WW2 for their percentage-size than Anglos. Mexican Americans gave to the World war 1 cause 200,000 American soldiers. 750,000 in WW2, 148,000 in the Korean War and 170,000 in Vietnam.
In the spirit of fairness, please see the following links. Controlling our immigration and having a balanced view of American history doesn't mean despising anyone-something far and away apart from the American traditions.
At the beginning of the French and Indian War (1754–1760), early Americans and American Indians depended on each other. George Washington quickly discovered this truth as a young man. In October 1753, Washington volunteered to investigate reports of French encroachments on Virginia's western frontier. A party of Seneca Indians escorted Washington over the western rim of the Appalachian Mountains. As far back as the American Revolution Oneidas and Tuscaroras sided with the Americans, owing in large measure to the efforts of their Presbyterian missionary Samuel Kirkland. The Revolution became a civil war for the Iroquois, as Oneidas clashed with Senecas at the Battle of Oriskany in 1777.
Following the Indian wars of the 1790s, the United States redoubled its commitment to what became known as the "civilization strategy." Benjamin Hawkins served as U.S. Indian agent to the Creeks from 1796 to 1816. During his tenure, Hawkins played a vital role in maintaining peaceful relations between Indians and whites. Frequent correspondence with Thomas Jefferson during his two terms as president (1801–1809) underscored the importance of his post. The Creeks referred to Hawkins as an isti atcagagi, or "beloved man," a title that denoted respect and political power among the Creeks.
The Tejanos
Wikipedia's article on the Tejanos
Tejanos.com
Native Americans in the US military
Texas Ranger History
more
...Two companies of American Indian Texas Rangers, one under a German immigrant Captain and one under a Lipan Apache Captain, fight the Comanche Nation on behalf of the Republic of Texas.
Throughout the Republic, both Hispanic and Indian Texans serve as Texas Rangers against the forces of Mexico, border guerillas and hostile Indians.
July - Pres. Mirabeau Lamar, completely ignoring the service of Indians friendly to the Republic, vows to rid Texas of Indians. He initiates a campaign to drive Cherokees from Texas.
Was there a genocide of native Americans by the United States?
"The most hideous enemy of native Americans was not the white man and his weaponry, concludes Alfred Crosby, "but the invisible killers which those men brought in their blood and breath." It is thought that between 75 to 90 percent of all Indian deaths resulted from these killers."...."Europeans did not come to the New World in order to infect the natives with deadly diseases"
"In the end, the sad fate of America's Indians represents not a crime but a tragedy, involving an irreconcilable collision of cultures and values. Despite the efforts of well-meaning people in both camps, there existed no good solution to this clash. The Indians were not prepared to give up the nomadic life of the hunter for the sedentary life of the farmer. The new Americans, convinced of their cultural and racial superiority, were unwilling to grant the original inhabitants of the continent the vast preserve of land required by the Indians’ way of life. The consequence was a conflict in which there were few heroes, but which was far from a simple tale of hapless victims and merciless aggressors. To fling the charge of genocide at an entire society serves neither the interests of the Indians nor those of history"
And yet the indigenous peoples culture has become part of what defines the United States.
As we move into the 21rst century mankind is facing the unimagined challenge of feeding and caring for 6 billion human beings. Nation states across the globe are suffering the current ravages of a globalism of profiteering multinational corporations destroying long standing industries and agriculture across the world trading the stability of societies for sweatshps and slave labor, trading cultures and nations for destabalizing mass immigration and a neoracist perspective that forebodes future conflicts by dragging out the old ones.
My thesis is that the peoples of the world need to stay largely in the nations as they have evolved to this point and preserve the industries and agriculture that sustain those nations.
The United States of America will loose the equality, stability, and freedoms that have been created here if we continue down the current road of ethnic identity politics, mass immigration,
open borders and "free trade" that is neither free nor fair and only benefits the multinational corporations and not the citizens of the various nations in the world.
If one reads through the links I have provided in this website one will see various attrocities-my point in posting these is to counter the neoracialists demonizing American history, not to demonize the descendants of the various peoples themselves. The long and brutal history in this hemisphere is often complex and contradictory-something ethnic idenity advocates on both sides seem to miss. Immigration needs to be managed in a lawfull manner-not a hatefull manner. Lawlessness in the name of compassion will not manage the modern world, it will only bring here the very things the illegal aliens are fleeing.
Globalism is not helping either.
Friday, December 21, 2007
Anti-Americanism the philosphy of the illegals exposed.
Insights into the movement this concept has inspired can be found at La Voz de Aztlan"
Thursday, December 20, 2007
New Wars: Refighting the Indian Wars
-James Atticus Bowden
James Atticus Bowden has specialized in inter-disciplinary long range 'futures' studies for over a decade. He is employed by a Defense Department contractor. He is a retired United States Army Infantry Officer. He is a 1972 graduate of the United States Military Academy and earned graduate degrees from Harvard University and Columbia University. He holds two elected Republican Party offices in Virginia.
New Wars: Refighting the Indian Wars
There need be "no quarter" for savages who break the laws of civilized war to pillage defenseless women and children..."
TODAY THE MULTICULTURALISTS HAVE SPUN HISTORY AS IF WE WERE THE ONES MURDERING DEFENSELESS WOMEN AND CHILDREN WHICH WAS THE INDIANS STANDARD OF WARFARE AND A CRIMMINAL EXCEPTION IN OUR CULTURE!
"Hunt 'em down...we're smoking 'em out...we have 'em on the run...dead or alive...we'll bring 'em to justice....victory under God."
The future of WW IV will be raids and occasional regime changes as needed. Eventually, our Homeland security will fear less about racial and religious profiling and focus more on criminal identification. Yet, as that simple issue shows, the domestic conflict between Liberals who will surrender – eventually – and Conservatives who will never surrender – ever - will worsen. Eventually, our domestic struggle, a Second American Civil War, will get resolved and one worldview will become our consensus culture. Until that day, America stands divided, and potentially as weak, as Rome before the Barbarians.
Wednesday, December 19, 2007
Another Anti-American Lib: multicultural mor-ass.
In his recent article "The illegal immigrant next door"
Lane Filler says,
" Why would I care about a Texan I'd never met more than a Mexican I'd never met? Why would I love the residents of Fargo more than the residents of Winnipeg? Why would I weep more for the poor children in Detroit than the ones in the Dominican Republic?"
Why Indeed? See the wonderboys article here.
Monday, December 17, 2007
Funding Hate: Foundations for the radical Hispanic Lobby
by Joseph Fallon; Fall 2000; published in The Social Contract
Revising history
"History" as told by supporters of LULAC, MALDEF, MEChA, and La Raza almost invariably includes not only the claim that "Hispanics" were here "first," but that "Hispanics" were established in large numbers throughout the Southwest at the time the United States annexed that territory in 1848.In fact, the Spanish Empire was unable to establish effective control over most of the land that today forms the seven States of the U.S. Southwest — Arizona, California, Colorado, Nevada, New Mexico, Texas, and Utah. The Indian nations — Apache, Comanche, Hopi, Navajo, Paiute, Shoshone, Ute, etc. — not only militarily defeated the Spanish attempt to invade and colonize this land, but the Apaches and Comanches counter-attacked and raided deep into what is now Mexico."
"After "identity," the next shared core belief of LULAC, MALDEF, MEChA, and La Raza is "history." What is presented as history, however, is a series of half-truths and total falsehoods to advance the "Hispanic" claim that "we were here first." A claim officially promoted by the U.S. government whose rewriting of history proves Orwell's dictum in 1984 — "Who control the presents controls the past; and who control the past controls the future.".......
America-A nation not an idea, a people not a science experiment.
I created this blog for us to exchange information, thoughts, and share our concern for our nation, our futures, and our posterity in this great nation. A place for Americans to remember who they are in this cultural war that seeks to destroy our pride, our heritage, and our future in a web of lies and deceits whose purpose is to dissolve our nation and people into a "world market" or "an idea" rather than a place, a country of people-of blood and soil.
Global Market? For who?
TexasRanger1848